<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Holistic Marketing &#187; blog police</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketing.life11.net/tag/blog-police/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketing.life11.net</link>
	<description>Control your mind, use the best techniques available, and tell the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 07:34:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Should you be worried about the FTC going after your blog?</title>
		<link>http://www.marketing.life11.net/should-you-be-worried-about-the-ftc-going-after-your-blog</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketing.life11.net/should-you-be-worried-about-the-ftc-going-after-your-blog#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 06:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing.life11.net/?p=253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FTC guideline has gotten more and more onerous in the echo chamber of the blogosphere, and bloggers are getting a bit paranoid about the implications. But it appears that this paranoia is misplaced, so you can all take a deep breath.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<p><a href="http://www.marketing.life11.net?goto=6748c8e60254d08c261b337f3292bb4f" rel="nofollow">Worried about the FTC going after your blog?</a>: &#8220;</p>
<p>One of the big discussions both here at <a href="http://www.marketing.life11.net?goto=efad0cede2529c848aaa40f3bfca444b" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Blogworld Expo</a> and in the blogosphere in general is the implication of the new <a href="http://www.marketing.life11.net?goto=47634e0fa82855e3e283ce98c9cbeaa6" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Federal Trade Commission&#8217;s</a> new regulations for online advertising practices from the Bureau of Consumer Protection.</p>
<p>The regulations seem to address the issue of <b>disclosure</b>: if I give you a copy of my book and you write about it, you have to let your readers know that. If I buy you dinner and then you write about my book or reference my site, you have to disclose that. And so on, and so on.</p>
<p>Problem is, this FTC guideline has gotten more and more onerous in the echo chamber of the blogosphere, and bloggers are getting a bit paranoid about the implications.</p>
<p>Luckily, it appears that this paranoia is misplaced, so you can all take a deep breath. Earlier this week &#8211; Oct 14th, 2009 &#8211; Mary Engle, associate director for advertising practices at the FTC&#8217;s Bureau of Consumer Protection, had a conference call with reporters to clarify the situation and here&#8217;s what she said:</p>
<p>&#8216;We&#8217;re not going to be patrolling the blogosphere, we are not planning on investigating individual bloggers.&#8217;</p>
<p>Engle emphasized that what they&#8217;ve released are new guidelines. &#8216;They aren&#8217;t rules and regulations, and they don&#8217;t have the force of law. They are guidelines intended to help advertisers comply with Section 5 of the <a href="http://www.marketing.life11.net?goto=019e2f9131474f8160b3bde0b9cfa791" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">FTC Act</a> [PDF]&#8216; which focuses on unfair or deceptive practices.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s not the rebirth of the Blog Police as the Disclosure Police, as I tweeted earlier while listening to a panel on this subject here at Blogworld, but it is nonetheless a reminder that you should still be transparent anyway. If a vendor pays $200 to write about their product, don&#8217;t run away in terror, just let your readers know.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s what this brouhaha is all about anyway: just be transparent and disclose what&#8217;s going on, and you&#8217;ll be in the clear from both the FTC and ethically on the right side of things too.</p>
<p>&#8221;</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.marketing.life11.net?goto=6bf7b968ed860500a0db868171e48462" rel="nofollow">The Intuitive Life</a>.)</p>
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketing.life11.net/should-you-be-worried-about-the-ftc-going-after-your-blog/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
